Skip to main content
San Jose Civic Gallery City Hall agenda intelligence

Matter CC 25-081

At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program.

Transportation Transportation and Environment Committee (T&E) Agenda Ready Introduced 21 Apr 2025
5 Documents on file 8.18 MB · 5 extracted · 5 AI summaries
File
CC 25-081
Type
Reports to Committee
Status
Agenda Ready
Requester
Unknown
Introduced
21 Apr 2025
Last synced
12 Jun 2026 · 20:20

The papers

01 1.6 MB

Memorandum

1.6 MB Extracted AI Summary
file f41b8b6e-4e35-4051-9226-5701e369cb22.pdf sha a85467b048a4 source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The memorandum discusses the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program, which was approved for environmental review by the Diridon Station Steering Committee on May 21, 2025. The proposal includes various improvements such as station reconfiguration, street closures, and noise barriers. The Partner Agencies involved have been collaborating since 2018 to enhance the Diridon Station to accommodate future transit needs. The At-Grade Alternative was selected over an Elevated Alternative due to cost, construction duration, and operational impacts. Next steps include selecting an environmental consulting contract and conducting further community engagement.

Key points
  • The Diridon Station Steering Committee approved the At-Grade Station Alternative for environmental review on May 21, 2025.
  • The proposal includes improvements such as station reconfiguration, street closures, and noise barriers.
  • The Partner Agencies have been working together since 2018 to enhance the Diridon Station.
  • The At-Grade Alternative was chosen over the Elevated Alternative due to lower costs and fewer operational impacts.
  • Next steps involve selecting an environmental consulting contract and further community engagement.
Limitations
  • The text contains unresolved placeholders and incomplete sections, which may affect the completeness of the summary.
  • Specific dates and details regarding the environmental review process and project timelines are not fully detailed.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 24,315 chars
COMMITTEE AGENDA: ITEM: 6/2/25 (d)3. TO: TRANSPORTATION AND FROM: John Ristow ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program Approved DATE: May 12, 2025 Date: 5/22/2025 COUNCIL DISTRICT: # 6 RECOMMENDATION (1) As recommended by the Diridon Station Steering Committee on May 21, 2025, accept the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program for environmental review, which includes the following: • At-Grade Station Alternative (platforms, tracks, historic station, concourse, plazas, bus facility, light rail station, other affected improvements); • West Virginia Street closure at the rail crossing with new pedestrian and bike undercrossing; • Auzerais Avenue grade separation; • San Carlos Street bridge replacement; • Park Avenue reconfiguration; • Noise/sound barriers at select crossings/locations; • Stockton Avenue/The Alameda reconfiguration; and (2) Refer and cross-reference the Diridon Station at Grade Station and Diridon Program Report to the June 10, 2025, City Council Meeting. SUMMARY AND OUTCOME On May 21, 2025, the Diridon Station Steering Committee accepted the staff recommendation of the Diridon Partner Agencies (Partner Agencies) to...
02 736 KB

Attachment A

736 KB Extracted AI Summary
file 56aad7ba-2576-49be-9fb8-2f82e87f3f2a.pdf sha 465ce88d1578 source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This memorandum outlines the recommendation for the At-Grade Station Alternative for Diridon Station, following a constructability analysis and community engagement. The Elevated Alternative was found to have significant flaws, including higher costs and construction duration. The At-Grade Alternative is recommended for environmental review, with various associated improvements and community feedback considered.

Key points
  • The Diridon Station Steering Committee is considering the At-Grade Station Alternative for approval.
  • The Elevated Alternative was deemed to have a fatal flaw and is not recommended.
  • The At-Grade Alternative maintains access to the Caltrain Maintenance Facility and has a lower cost and shorter construction period.
  • Community engagement revealed broad support for the project, emphasizing the need for safety, noise management, and connectivity.
  • The environmental review process for the project is expected to take up to three years.
Limitations
  • The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and lacks finalized details in some sections.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 9,973 chars
6.a Attachment A Subject: Acceptance of May 21, 2025, Diridon Steering Committee Recommendation Page 1 of 4 Memorandum TO: Diridon Station Steering Committee FROM: Marian Lee, Caltrain Diridon Director Jessica Zenk, City of San Jose Director DATE: May 21, 2025 SUBJECT: Diridon Station Recommended Alternative and Community Engagement FOR ACTION INTRODUCTION At the March Steering Committee meeting, staff presented key findings from the constructability analysis of two station design alternatives (Elevated and At-Grade). The Elevated Alternative was found to have a fatal flaw. Short of making a decision on the station alternatives based on the findings, additional community engagement was recommended to discuss the findings with the community as well as continue to solicit their input on the remaining viable At-Grade Alternative. With conceptual engineering efforts and community engagement now complete for this phase of the project, staff is seeking Steering Committee approval of the recommended At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program of Projects for environmental review. DISCUSSION Background The Diridon Partners are working together to plan for the transformation of San...
03 2.92 MB

Attachment B

2.92 MB Extracted AI Summary
file e4725368-2597-43d1-87ea-5f9ab647807f.pdf sha 35e9289f99b9 source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document appears to be a draft of a Community Engagement Report for the Diridon Station Business Case, prepared by the City of San José with support from Winter Consulting. It outlines the engagement process and feedback from community members regarding the redesign of Diridon Station, which is set to become a significant transit hub. The report includes sections on outreach goals, completed activities, promotion strategies, and feedback received from the community. The engagement process involved various interactive activities and aimed to prioritize equity and inclusivity.

Key points
  • The report is focused on the Diridon Station redesign project, which involves five public agencies.
  • Community engagement began in late 2023 and continued through April 2025.
  • The report includes feedback from over 800 individual comments from approximately 760 community members.
  • Engagement activities included meetings, pop-ups, and an online open house, reaching over 5,700 community members.
  • The outreach strategy emphasized equity, inclusivity, and accessibility.
Limitations
  • The document is a draft and may contain incomplete information.
  • Some sections are truncated, limiting the completeness of the summary.
  • Specific dates, votes, dollar amounts, and outcomes are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 36,069 chars
Attachment B Subject: Acceptance of May 21, 2025, Diridon Steering Committee Recommendation Page 1 of 24 Community Engagement Report Diridon Station Business Case Prepared by the City of San José with support from Winter Consulting May 2025 Community Engagement Report | Diridon Station Business Case May 2025 Page 1 of 24 Attachment B Subject: Acceptance of May 21, 2025, Diridon Steering Committee Recommendation Page 2 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 B. OUTREACH GOALS AND STRATEGIES ............................................................................................. 5 C. SUMMARY OF COMPLETED ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................... 10 D. PROMOTION OF ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................ 13 E. WHAT WE HEARD ........................................................................................................................ 16 Community Engagement Report | Diridon Station Business Case May 2025 Page 2...
04 2.77 MB

Presentation

2.77 MB Extracted AI Summary
file bc8c97f1-29d8-475a-997c-717cccf17de6.pdf sha c047491c816a source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document discusses the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program, presented by Jessica Zenk and Ramses Madou from the Department of Transportation. It outlines goals related to community development, passenger experience, stakeholder engagement, and safe transit operations. The document includes a visioning process, constructability analysis findings comparing at-grade and elevated options, community engagement feedback, and staff recommendations for environmental review. Key elements of the project and next steps are also highlighted.

Key points
  • Goals include community development, passenger experience, stakeholder engagement, and safe transit operations.
  • The visioning process involves assessing station components and developing alternatives.
  • Constructability analysis compares at-grade and elevated options in terms of construction period, cost, and impacts.
  • Community engagement highlights pros and cons of both at-grade and elevated alternatives.
  • Staff recommends approving the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program for environmental review.
  • Next steps involve actions by partner agencies, selecting environmental consulting contracts, and further community engagement.
Limitations
  • The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and unresolved sections.
  • Specific dates, votes, dollar amounts, and outcomes are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 4,082 chars
(d)3. At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program Jessica Zenk, Deputy Director Ramses Madou, Division Manager Dept. of Transportation Transportation and Environment Committee June 2, 2025 Goals The Surrounding Community: An anchor for economic & community development The Passenger Experience: A connected, multi-modal and passenger-friendly station Partners & Key Stakeholders: Achieving strategic aims and optimizing benefits for Partners and key stakeholders Safe Transit Operators & Operations: Providing sufficient capacity, facilitating safe, integrated and reliable transit operations The Station Building: A sustainable, future-proof and resilient station 2 Visioning and Alternatives Development Assess Station Components Develop Alternatives (3) 2024 Refine Alternatives (3) Recommend Recommended Alternatives (2) Alternative (1) May 2025 3 Constructability Analysis Key Findings Considerations At-Grade Elevated Construction Period & Rail Service Impacts 7 – 10 Years 10 – 12 Years Cost ($2023) $3B-$6B $5B-$10B Existing Rail Corridor Modest encroachments outside existing corridor Significant encroachments outside existing corridor Maintains access to CEMOF FATAL FLAWS Loses...
05 168 KB

Letters from the Public

168 KB Extracted AI Summary
file 540ce11f-5844-4a4f-9c95-0b7540fb0c76.pdf sha d2e49366d39c source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) submitted comments on the Diridon Station Status Report, expressing support for the project and emphasizing the importance of including bike lanes, shared use paths, and bicycle parking facilities. They also requested coordination with the 'Reimagining Santa Clara Street' initiative and highlighted the potential for the station to promote greener transportation options.

Key points
  • BPAC supports the Diridon Station project and looks forward to its completion.
  • They request inclusion of bike lanes and shared use paths in the project.
  • Coordination with the 'Reimagining Santa Clara Street' initiative is requested.
  • Bicycle parking facilities should be included to accommodate current and future riders.
  • Efforts should be made to connect bikeways from major streets to the Diridon Station and other transit centers.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 2,130 chars
TO: TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: Diridon Station Status Report FROM: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee DATE: 5/19/25 ______________________________________________________________________________ Your Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) would like to submit the following comments on the "Diridon Station Status Report": 1. We support our City’s plan for Diridon Station, and we look forward to this project’s completion. 2. Given the new and uncertain budgeting constraints, we ask you to do whatever is needed to ensure that these remain part of this project: a. Please ensure that key elements of this plan include bike lanes, a shared use path, and ensure that this station’s interaction with adjacent roads favors vulnerable roadways users in alignment with Vision Zero goals. b. If this isn’t being done already, we ask that the “Reimagining Santa Clara Street” initiative be coordinated with VTA on the timeline, construction, and planning of the Diridon Station. c. Given Diridon Station will connect commuters to AMTRAK, CALTRAIN, and VTA options, and there is local, regional, and statewide support of mode shift, please include bicycle parking...