Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The memorandum provides a status report on the Development Fee Framework, detailing the work of the Development Fee Framework Working Group, which aims to create a transparent and predictable fee structure for residential development. The report outlines the history of the Framework, objectives, and future work plans, including the development of a draft Council Policy and implementation phases. It also discusses the Parks Development Fee Study and its current status, emphasizing the need for further analysis and coordination with various departments.
Key points
The Development Fee Framework aims to simplify and standardize development fees for residential projects.
The Working Group has resumed its meetings to work towards a Council Policy to be adopted in spring 2025.
The Framework is intended to enhance transparency and predictability for developers and the public.
The Parks Development Fee Study is currently paused pending further analysis and coordination with other departments.
Limitations
The text is truncated, which may limit the completeness of the summary.
Specific dates and details regarding the Council Policy and other elements may be incomplete due to truncation.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 18,909 chars
CED AGENDA: FILE: ITEM: TO: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: Chris Burton SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT FEE FRAMEWORK STATUS REPORT DATE: April 12, 2024 Approved Date 4/22/24 CC 24-339 (d)5 4/14/24 RECOMMENDATION Accept a status report on the creation and implementation of the Development Fee Framework, including consideration of the analysis of the Parks Development Impact Fee Study. SUMMARY AND OUTCOME Staff resumed work on the Development Fee Framework through the reconvening of the Development Fee Framework Working Group (Working Group). The Working Group will continue to work toward a previously identified objective and goals. The status report outlines work that will culminate in the adoption of a City Council Policy in spring 2025 that will memorialize the Development Fee Framework. BACKGROUND In March 2019, the City Council added an item at the Council Priority Setting Session entitled the “Universal Development Fee.” This priority directed staff to explore creating a universal development fee and structure for residential development that contains all current development taxes and impact fees. In November 2019, staff recommended pursuing a Development Fee...
Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The document is a status report on the Development Fee Framework presented to the Community and Economic Development Committee. It outlines the background, objectives, and proposed work plan for the framework, which aims to simplify the administration of residential development fees and enhance transparency. The report also discusses a study related to park fees and its current status.
Key points
The Development Fee Framework aims to align fees for a holistic view of city costs.
The framework seeks to facilitate housing production by making costs transparent and predictable.
No increases or decreases to fees or changes to the legal structure are proposed.
Goals include adopting a Council Policy and developing resources for estimating development costs.
A working group has been reestablished to meet bimonthly starting April 2024.
A study on park fees is on hold pending market conditions and further fiscal analysis.
Limitations
The document contains unresolved placeholders and lacks specific details on certain aspects.
The timeline for the proposed work plan includes phases with unspecified dates.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 2,651 chars
Development Fee Framework Status Report Community and Economic Development Committee April 22, 2024 Item (d)5 Jerad Ferguson, Principal Planner, PBCE 1 Background 2019 February 2021 January 2022 Concept of Changes to IHO Working Group “Universal changes include Fee established to Development Fee” Framework further work on introduced Geography Fee Framework Shift to concept of June 2022 Report to CED introduced concept of Council Policy June 2023 Council Adopted Housing Element included item P-10 “Standardize and Streamline Permitting, Fees, Applications” “Framework” 2 Concept and Established Outcomes • Aligning fees in Framework gives holistic view of City added costs • Facilitate housing production by making costs more transparent and predictable • Not proposing increases or decreases to fees or change legal structure Development Fee Framework Outcomes Simplify the administration and calculation of major residential development fees and taxes to provide transparency and certainty to the Objective public and development community. Adoption of a Council Policy to memorialize the Development Fee Framework elements and parameters. Goal #1 Goal #2 Develop a webpage and other...
Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The document contains letters from San Jose residents and community leaders addressing the Community and Economic Development Committee regarding the Development Fee Framework Status Report and the Parks Development Impact Fee Study. The letters express concerns about the potential impacts of fee restructuring on park funding, the need for transparency in fee management, and the importance of community input in the decision-making process. They highlight the reliance on Construction and Conveyance taxes and the Park Trust Fund for park maintenance and improvements, and request clarification on various aspects of the proposed fee changes.
Key points
Residents express concerns about the Development Fee Framework's impact on park funding.
The letters emphasize the importance of transparency in fee management and distribution.
Community input is deemed essential for the decision-making process regarding park funding.
The reliance on Construction and Conveyance taxes and the Park Trust Fund for park maintenance is highlighted.
Questions are raised about the feasibility and implications of proposed fee changes.
Limitations
The document appears to be a draft as it contains placeholder sections and unresolved questions.
Specific dates, votes, or dollar amounts are not provided in the text.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 13,729 chars
Fw: CED April 22, 2024 Agenda, item (d) 5: “Development Fee Framework Status Report” and an “analysis of the Parks Development Impact Fee Study.” Agendadesk <Agendadesk@sanjoseca.gov> Fri 4/19/2024 2:17 PM U 1 attachments (662 KB) DevelopmentFeeFramework-2024Apr19.pdf; From: City Clerk <city.clerk@sanjoseca.gov> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 2:15 PM To: Agendadesk <Agendadesk@sanjoseca.gov> Subject: FW: CED April 22, 2024 Agenda, item (d) 5: “Development Fee Framework Status Report” and an “analysis of the Parks Development Impact Fee Study.” From: MINI Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 2:12 PM To: District9 <district9@sanjoseca.gov>; District3 <district3 @sanjoseca.gov>; District1 <district1@sanjoseca.gov>; District5 <District5@sanjoseca.gov>; District 10 <District10@sanjoseca.gov> Cc: The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <mayor@sanjoseca.gov>; District2 <District2@sanjoseca.gov>; District4 <District4@sanjoseca.gov>; District 6 <district6@sanjoseca.gov>; District7 <District7@sanjoseca.gov>; District8 <district8@sanjoseca.gov>; City Clerk <city.clerk@sanjoseca.gov>; Maguire, Jennifer <jennifer.maguire@sanjoseca.gov>; Quevedo, Matthew <Matthew.Quevedo@sanjoseca.gov>; Mossing, Mackenzie...