Options for Expanding Alternative Response and Co-Response Programs to 911 Calls for Service.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This memorandum discusses options for expanding alternative response and co-response programs for 911 calls for service. It includes recommendations to accept a report on these options and to refer it to the City Council for further consideration. The report outlines three projects aimed at improving responses to calls involving individuals with disabilities, mental health crises, and domestic violence. It highlights findings from these projects and suggests potential models for alternative responses, including partnerships with the County. The memorandum also notes the need for continued collaboration and funding considerations for future implementation.

Key points

• The memorandum is addressed to the Public Safety, Finance and Strategic Support Committee.
• It discusses options for expanding alternative response and co-response programs to 911 calls.
• Recommendations include accepting a report and referring it to the City Council.
• The report covers three projects related to individuals with disabilities, mental health crises, and domestic violence.
• Nine findings were developed based on the analysis of these projects.
• The City Council directed staff to explore alternative response models and report back in the Fall of 2024.
• The memorandum will be posted on the City’s agenda website for upcoming meetings.

Limitations

• The text contains unresolved placeholders and truncated sections that limit the completeness of the summary.
• Specific dates and funding amounts are mentioned but not detailed in the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document discusses options for expanding alternative and co-response programs to 911 calls for service in San José. It outlines community needs for better services, existing local programs, and findings related to disability and domestic violence responses. Recommendations include accepting a staff report and referring it to the City Council.

Key points

• The document is presented to the Public Safety, Finance, and Strategic Support Committee.
• It addresses the need for better services for city residents in relation to 911 calls.
• Alternative response involves civilian personnel responding without police, while co-response includes civilian personnel responding alongside police.
• The City Council has directed exploration of co-response and alternative response models for individuals with disabilities and mental health issues.
• A partnership with the County of Santa Clara is suggested to expand alternative response and 911-to-988 call diversion.
• Findings indicate a call for prioritization of alternative response funding over co-response for the disability community.
• Recommendations include accepting the staff report and referring it to the City Council.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and unresolved sections.
• Specific dates, votes, dollar amounts, and outcomes are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document contains comments from the Community Safety Workgroup of the REAL Coalition regarding an agenda item for the Public Safety, Finance, and Strategic Support Committee (PSFSS) meeting on October 17, 2024. The comments focus on expanding alternative response and co-response programs to 911 calls for service. The coalition requests that the committee defer acceptance of the report and provide updated recommendations, including a response from the California Department of Health Care Services about funding legality. The letter outlines various findings and recommendations related to community safety, disability considerations, and the need for improved crisis intervention training.

Key points

• The REAL Coalition submitted comments on an agenda item for the PSFSS meeting.
• They request deferral of the report and updated recommendations within 60 days.
• Concerns were raised about the needs of community members living with disabilities.
• The coalition emphasizes the importance of alternative response programs over co-response models.
• They call for an official ruling on the legality of using Opioid Settlement Funds for TRUST funding.
• The coalition advocates for hiring more clinicians skilled in communicating with individuals with disabilities.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and unfilled sections.
• Specific details such as the exact date of the PSFSS meeting and the content of the attached letter are not fully provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

YWCA Golden Gate Silicon Valley submitted a public comment regarding the San José Police Department's coordinated response systems for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault. The comment highlights the partnership between YWCA and SJPD, detailing the services provided through the Family Violence Center and the Domestic Violence High Risk Response Team. It emphasizes the need for additional resources to meet increasing demand and improve service delivery for survivors.

Key points

• YWCA provides advocacy and support for domestic violence survivors through its partnership with SJPD.
• The Family Violence Center (FVC) is staffed by YWCA and various agencies, offering immediate support to survivors.
• There has been a significant increase in the number of follow-ups and ongoing case management services provided by YWCA.
• The Domestic Violence High Risk Response Team (DVHRRT) aims to reduce intimate partner homicide by targeting high-risk cases.
• YWCA requests additional resources to enhance advocacy response and improve service delivery for survivors.

Limitations

• The text is truncated and does not provide complete information on all services and statistics.
• Unresolved placeholders and missing information affect the completeness of the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.