PDA11-002-02 & ER25-039 - Administrative Hearing on the Appeal of the Planning Director’s Approval and Planned Development Permit Amendment Located at 1123 Coleman Avenue.

This memorandum discusses an administrative hearing regarding the appeal of the Planning Director's approval for a Planned Development Permit Amendment at 1123 Coleman Avenue, allowing up to 15 concerts per year at PayPal Park. The memorandum outlines recommendations for the City Council, including conducting the hearing, adopting resolutions to deny the environmental appeal, and approving the permit amendment with conditions. It details the project's background, including previous environmental impact reports, noise assessments, and mitigation measures to manage concert noise. The hearing is a de novo process, meaning the City Council will review the request anew, considering all relevant information.

Key points

• The memorandum is addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding an appeal of the Planning Director's approval.
• The subject of the memorandum is the Planned Development Permit Amendment for PayPal Park, allowing up to 15 concerts per year.
• The City Council is recommended to conduct an administrative hearing and adopt resolutions related to the appeal.
• The project site is located at 1123 Coleman Avenue, occupied by PayPal Park.
• The memorandum discusses the need for noise mitigation measures due to the proximity of residential areas and the airport.
• The project does not include any building modifications or tree removals.
• The hearing is a de novo process, allowing the City Council to review the request and make findings.

Limitations

• The document contains placeholders and unresolved sections, which affect the completeness of the summary.
• Specific dates and details regarding the appeals and previous approvals are mentioned but not fully detailed.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a noise assessment report for proposed concerts at PayPal Park Stadium in San Jose, California, prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. It evaluates noise levels from concerts, describes the existing noise environment, and provides recommendations for noise control. The stadium, which has 18,000 seats, is primarily used for Major League Soccer and would host up to 15 concerts per year. The assessment includes long-term and short-term noise measurements, concert simulations, and noise modeling results. The report outlines the methodology and findings related to ambient noise levels and the potential impact of concert noise on nearby sensitive receptors.

Key points

• The report evaluates noise levels from proposed concerts at PayPal Park Stadium.
• The stadium is an open-roof facility with 18,000 seats, primarily serving Major League Soccer.
• The project proposes up to 15 concerts per year, lasting up to 4 hours and ending by 11:00 p.m.
• Noise assessments include long-term and short-term measurements and concert simulations.
• Recommendations for noise control are provided based on the assessment findings.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as indicated by the title and formatting.
• Some sections of the report are truncated, limiting the completeness of the summary.
• Specific dates and measurements are referenced but not fully detailed in the provided text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is an addendum to the Airport West Stadium and Great Oaks Place Environmental Impact Report (EIR), prepared by the City of San José. It outlines a proposed amendment to allow up to 15 concerts per year at the existing stadium, with specific noise mitigation measures. The addendum states that the changes do not raise new significant environmental impacts and that a supplemental noise assessment was conducted to ensure compliance with noise levels. The document includes details about the project description, location, and the environmental impacts previously assessed in the EIR.

Key points

• The addendum allows for up to 15 concerts per year at the existing stadium.
• Concerts can occur any day of the week, starting no earlier than 9:00 AM and ending no later than 11:00 PM.
• No physical alterations to the stadium site are proposed.
• A supplemental noise assessment was prepared to ensure concert noise levels remain at or below ambient conditions.
• The addendum proposes changes to a noise mitigation measure to allow speakers to face south, away from the airport.

Limitations

• The text indicates a noise assessment was prepared in June 2025, which may not be finalized.
• Specific dates and details regarding the approval process and previous permits are mentioned but not fully detailed.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

Exhibit C is an Environmental Appeal Application for the San José City Council. It outlines the process for appealing an environmental determination made by City staff. The application must be submitted by email or in person by the deadline of 5:00 p.m. on the third business day following the public hearing. The appeal must specify reasons for contesting the environmental determination and must be based on issues raised at the public hearing. Fees vary based on the applicant's status, and an invoice must be paid within 14 days for the appeal to be valid. Contact information for City Planners is provided for further inquiries.

Key points

• Application is for appealing environmental determinations made by City staff.
• Must be submitted by email or in person by 5:00 p.m. on the third business day after the public hearing.
• Must specify reasons for the appeal and be based on issues raised at the public hearing.
• Fees vary depending on whether the appellant is a project applicant or non-applicant.
• An invoice for the appeal fee must be paid within 14 calendar days for the appeal to be valid.
• Contact information for City Planners is provided for questions.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as it contains placeholders for dates and other information that are not filled in.
• The reason for the appeal is referenced as being attached in a separate letter, which is not included in the text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This letter from Matthew Bright, representing the Newhall Neighborhood Association, addresses concerns regarding the proposed permit amendment and environmental documentation related to concerts at a stadium in San Jose. Bright argues that the City has not conducted sufficient due diligence in analyzing the application, citing contradictions between the City's conclusions and the applicant's own noise study. He requests the rejection of the application or a deferral to allow for further collaboration on mitigation measures. Key issues raised include flawed noise study characterizations, inadequate proposed mitigation measures, and concerns about economic impacts on local businesses. Bright urges the City to ensure fair and unbiased noise monitoring and to consider the broader economic development priorities of the city.

Key points

• The Newhall Neighborhood is home to diverse residents and housing types.
• Bright argues that neighbors lack the technical training to fully engage in permit discussions.
• Concerns are raised about the City's analysis of the applicant's noise study, which is claimed to be flawed.
• The proposed revised mitigation measures are criticized for not adequately addressing concert noise and for being temporary.
• Bright emphasizes the need for real-time, unbiased noise monitoring to protect residential areas.
• Economic impacts of the stadium on local retail businesses are highlighted as negative.
• The letter calls for alignment with the city's economic development priorities, particularly regarding a proposed downtown entertainment district.

Limitations

• The letter appears to be a draft as indicated by the use of 'Draft' in references to permit documents.
• Specific dates, votes, dollar amounts, and parties involved are not provided in the text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is an appeal application for a Planned Development Permit Amendment related to the operation of concerts at the San Jose Earthquakes Stadium. The appeal is filed by Clyde Hoffmann, a resident within 1,000 feet of the stadium, in cooperation with the Newhall Neighborhood Association. The application includes details on who may appeal, deadlines, fees, and submission methods. It references a specific permit decision and includes attachments related to the appeal.

Key points

• The appeal application is for a Planned Development Permit Amendment for the San Jose Earthquakes Stadium.
• Clyde Hoffmann is the person filing the appeal, representing residents within 1,000 feet of the stadium.
• The appeal must be filed within 10 calendar days of the permit decision.
• The application includes a requirement for a completed form, an assessor's parcel map, and payment of fees.
• The document references a specific permit decision (PDA11-002-02) and includes attachments for reasons for the appeal.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as indicated by the presence of placeholders and incomplete fields.
• The date for the appeal submission is marked as [MM/DD/YYYY], which is unresolved.
• The mailing address and email fields for the person filing the appeal are incomplete.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document discusses an Environmental Appeal and Permit Appeal regarding the Director's Decision on the Addendum to the Airport West Stadium and Great Oaks Place Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The site is located at 1123 Coleman Avenue, currently used as PayPal Park, and the proposal includes hosting up to 15 concerts per year with specific conditions on noise management. The appeals were filed by neighbors concerned about noise impacts and the adequacy of the environmental review. Staff recommends denying the appeals and upholding the Director's decision.

Key points

• Site Address: 1123 Coleman Avenue, San Jose, CA.
• Existing Use: PayPal Park.
• Proposed concerts: Up to 15 per year, Monday-Sunday, 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
• Change in mitigation measure to allow amplified sound to face south.
• Environmental Appeal filed on November 24, 2025; Permit Appeal filed on December 1, 2025.
• Concerns raised include noise impacts and the adequacy of the noise study.
• Staff recommends denying the appeals and approving the planned development permit.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft.
• Specific details regarding the appeals and the Director's decision are not fully resolved.
• Unresolved placeholders and blank fields affect the completeness of the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document appears to be an email from the City email system, indicating it is from an external source. There are no substantive details provided regarding the content of the letters from the public.

Limitations

• The text does not provide any specific information about the letters from the public.
• There are unresolved placeholders and missing information.
• The document does not indicate whether it is a draft or final version.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document appears to be a draft communication regarding a presentation made by Matthew Bright, President of the Newhall Neighborhood Association, at a San José council meeting. The presentation addresses concerns about the impact of concerts at a stadium approved in 2010, emphasizing that the original mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts are being reversed. The communication includes requests for confirmation of receipt of the presentation and mentions the need for proper monitoring of noise levels related to the concerts.

Key points

• The presentation was made at the 2/24/2026 council meeting under item 10.3.
• Concerns are raised about the reversal of commitments regarding concert noise mitigation.
• The document discusses the need for independent monitoring of noise levels from concerts.
• Matthew Bright is the President of the Newhall Neighborhood Association.

Limitations

• The document contains unresolved placeholders and incomplete information.
• Specific dates and details regarding the council meeting and presentation are not fully clear.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.