Approval of the 2025-2026 Operating Budget and the 2025-2027 Biennial Capital Budget for the City of San José and Schedule of Fees and Charges. - NOT TO BE HEARD BEFORE 1:30 P.M.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document is the 2025-2026 Proposed Operating Budget prepared by the Office of the City Manager. It includes various sections such as the Mayor and City Council, City Manager's Budget Office Staff, awards received, budget message, and detailed attachments regarding fund strategies and city services. The document outlines the budget process, policies, and provides a comprehensive overview of the city's financial planning for the upcoming fiscal years.

Key points

• Prepared by the Office of the City Manager.
• Includes a budget message from the City Manager.
• Contains awards for budget excellence.
• Features a detailed table of contents with various sections related to city services and financial policies.
• Lists city departments and council appointees.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as indicated by the repeated mention of 'Proposed Operating Budget' without finalization.
• Some sections of the document are truncated, leading to incomplete information.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document outlines the 2025-2027 Proposed Biennial Capital Budget and the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program for the City of San José, prepared by the Office of the City Manager. It details the planning, scheduling, and budgeting of capital improvement projects over the next five years, emphasizing the need for infrastructure rehabilitation and expansion across various city services. The budget includes a comparison with the previous year's budget and highlights funding sources and anticipated expenditures.

Key points

• The document presents the 2025-2027 Proposed Biennial Capital Budget and the 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program.
• It is prepared by the Office of the City Manager and aims to guide capital improvement projects over the next five years.
• The budget reflects a 17.9% decrease from the previous year's adopted capital budget.
• The total proposed CIP for 2026-2030 is $3.4 billion, a 14.2% decrease from the previous five-year plan.
• The document discusses various funding sources for the capital programs, including taxes, fees, and contributions from other agencies.

Limitations

• The text appears to be truncated, missing some details and sections.
• Specific dates, votes, and dollar amounts are not provided for all items.
• There are unresolved placeholders and blank fields that affect the completeness of the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The 2025-2026 Proposed Fees and Charges Report outlines the fees and charges associated with the City’s General Fund and selected other funds. It is prepared by the Office of the City Manager and indicates projected revenues of approximately $147.5 million, with $54.1 million for the General Fund. The report highlights various departmental fee programs, their cost recovery rates, and proposed changes, including fee increases and decreases based on activity levels and cost adjustments. The report emphasizes the goal of achieving 100% cost recovery for most programs while considering equity impacts on communities.

Key points

• The report documents fees and charges for the City’s General Fund and selected other funds.
• Projected revenue for 2025-2026 is approximately $147.5 million, with $54.1 million for the General Fund.
• Major revenue sources include the Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Department, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Department, Fire Department, and Public Works Department.
• The overall cost recovery rate for Category I fees is 82.8%, an increase from the previous year.
• Proposed fee changes include increases and decreases based on activity levels and costs.
• Development-related fee activity is projected to decline in 2025-2026 due to various economic factors.
• The report includes details on departmental fees, cost recovery rates, and staffing adjustments.

Limitations

• The text appears to be truncated, missing sections that may contain additional details.
• Unresolved placeholders and blank fields affect the completeness of the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

This memorandum discusses the revision of the Police Department’s Card Room Regulatory Fee and the alignment of Title 16 with state gaming regulations. It recommends that the City Manager collaborate with casinos and the Police Department to amend Title 16 by removing municipal regulations that overlap with state regulations while retaining certain authorities and enforcement provisions. It also proposes reducing non-sworn positions in the gaming division and adjusting Card Room Regulatory Fees accordingly. The memorandum highlights the financial significance of local cardrooms to the city's budget and the need for fair regulation in light of past voter measures and state rulings.

Key points

• The memorandum is from Councilmembers Bien Doan, Pamela Campos, and George Casey.
• It recommends amending Title 16 to remove duplicative regulations with state law.
• It suggests reducing non-sworn positions in the gaming division and adjusting regulatory fees.
• The local cardrooms contribute significantly to the city's General Fund.
• Measure H, approved by voters, increased cardroom taxes but faced compliance issues with state law.
• The proposed changes aim to streamline regulations and maintain public safety oversight.

Limitations

• The document does not specify the exact details of the proposed amendments to Title 16.
• There are unresolved placeholders regarding specific positions and fee amounts.
• The text does not provide information on the timeline for the proposed changes beyond Fall 2025.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft resolution from the City Council of San Jose, approving the Operating Budget for fiscal year 2025-2026. The budget was submitted by the City Manager on May 1, 2025, and public hearings were held regarding the proposal. The resolution indicates that the budget was modified by the City Council on June 10, 2025, and directs the City Manager to file the adopted budget with the City Clerk.

Key points

• Resolution No. is not specified.
• The Proposed Operating Budget was submitted on May 1, 2025.
• Public hearings were conducted for public input.
• A public hearing was held on June 9, 2025.
• The budget was approved for adoption on June 10, 2025.
• The City Manager is directed to file the adopted budget with the City Clerk.

Limitations

• The resolution number is missing.
• The specific day for adoption in 2025 is not filled in.
• The vote results (AYES, NOES, ABSENT, DISQUALIFIED) are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft resolution from the City Council of San Jose approving the Biennial Capital Budget for fiscal years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027. The resolution references the submission of the Proposed Biennial Capital Budget by the City Manager on April 25, 2025, and notes that public hearings were conducted. The City Council held a public hearing on June 9, 2025, and the resolution indicates that the budget was modified and approved for adoption on June 10, 2025.

Key points

• The resolution is for the Biennial Capital Budget for fiscal years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027.
• The Proposed Biennial Capital Budget was submitted by the City Manager on April 25, 2025.
• Public hearings were held regarding the Proposed Biennial Capital Budget.
• A public hearing took place on June 9, 2025.
• The budget was approved for adoption by the City Council on June 10, 2025.

Limitations

• The document contains placeholders for the resolution number and adoption date.
• The document is marked as a draft and indicates that it is not the final version.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft resolution from the City Council of San Jose approving the Five Year Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2026-2030. The program was submitted by the City Manager on April 25, 2025, and public hearings were held to allow community input. The City Council is set to adopt the program on June 10, 2025.

Key points

• Resolution No. is not specified.
• The Five Year Capital Improvement Program covers fiscal years 2026-2030.
• The program was submitted to the City Council on April 25, 2025.
• Public hearings were conducted for community input.
• A public hearing is scheduled for June 9, 2025.
• The City Council will adopt the program on June 10, 2025.

Limitations

• The resolution number is not filled in.
• The specific day of adoption in 2025 is not filled in.
• Votes for AYES, NOES, ABSENT, and DISQUALIFIED are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft resolution from the City Council of San Jose, amending Resolution No. 72737 to establish various fees and charges effective July 1, 2025. It outlines a series of amendments to existing fees related to police department services, including fingerprinting, photographs, duplicate tapes, computerized services, and amusement device licenses, among others.

Key points

• The resolution amends Resolution No. 72737.
• It establishes various fees and charges effective July 1, 2025.
• Amendments include fees for fingerprinting, photographs, duplicate tapes, and computerized services.
• Specific fees are listed for police recruit academy, amusement device licenses, and canvassers of periodicals permits.

Limitations

• The document is a draft and may not reflect final decisions.
• Some sections of the fee schedule are truncated and not fully visible.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft ordinance from the City of San Jose that amends Chapter 4.80 of Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code. It establishes several new assessment district funds: the Evergreen Benefit Assessment District Fund, Evergreen Creek Assessment District Fund, Shea Homes Advance Assessment District Fund, Silicon Valley Bridge Assessment District Fund, Silver Creek Assessment District Fund, and Willow Glen Community Benefit Improvement District Fund. Each fund is created to manage and allocate funds received from cost-sharing agreements or property assessments for public improvements and enhanced services within their respective districts.

Key points

• Establishes new assessment district funds in the San Jose Municipal Code.
• Funds are sourced from cost-sharing agreements or property assessments.
• Funds are designated for public improvements and enhanced services.
• The ordinance is subject to CEQA and has been determined not to constitute a project.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft and contains unresolved placeholders for dates and votes.
• Specific details about the funding amounts and exact implementation dates are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

On May 15, 2025, the Treatment Plant Advisory Committee (TPAC) reviewed two items: the Proposed 2025-2026 Operating & Maintenance Budget and the Proposed 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program for the San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility. TPAC recommended approval for both items, with voting results provided.

Key points

• TPAC reviewed the Proposed 2025-2026 Operating & Maintenance Budget.
• TPAC recommended approval with a vote of 6 Ayes and 1 Nay.
• TPAC reviewed the Proposed 2026-2030 Capital Improvement Program.
• TPAC recommended approval with a vote of 5 Ayes and 2 Nays.

Limitations

• The text does not provide specific details about the budget amounts or project descriptions.
• There are unresolved placeholders regarding the document's final status.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Hilary Thorsen, a former Library and Education commissioner for District 6, submitted a written comment for Agenda Item 3.9. She urges the adoption of M.B.A. 14 to make the elimination of library late fees permanent, citing a 20% increase in library usage and its positive impact on literacy and public safety. Thorsen also advocates for Budget Document #45 to restore funding for the Family, Friend, and Neighbor Caregivers Support Network, emphasizing the need for support for families and children in San Jose.

Key points

• Hilary Thorsen is a former Library and Education commissioner for District 6.
• She urges the adoption of M.B.A. 14 to make the elimination of library late fees permanent.
• Library usage has increased by 20% since late fees were temporarily eliminated.
• Increased library usage is linked to higher literacy rates and public safety.
• Thorsen advocates for Budget Document #45 to restore funding for caregiver support programs.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.