Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The memorandum from Mayor Mahan, Vice Mayor Foley, and Councilmember Campos recommends that the City Manager place the draft Coyote Valley Corridor Study on a future City Council agenda as a consent item. The study, initiated by the Council in November 2021, aims to analyze potential uses for properties in Coyote Valley that support agriculture and open space. The study was paused in June 2025 but may be continued by a future Council.
Key points
Memorandum from Mayor Mahan, Vice Mayor Foley, and Councilmember Campos.
Recommendation to place the draft Coyote Valley Corridor Study on a future City Council agenda.
Study initiated on November 16, 2021, to analyze uses for properties in Coyote Valley.
Study paused in June 2025 to redirect staff resources.
Future Council may continue the study based on resources and capacity.
Limitations
The document appears to be a draft.
Unresolved placeholders and blank fields affect the completeness of the summary.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 1,157 chars
RULES COMMITTEE: 2/25/2026 ITEM: C.2 TO: RULES AND OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: SEE BELOW Approved FROM: Mayor Mahan Vice Mayor Foley Councilmember Campos DATE: February 9, 2026 Date: 2/09/2026 SUBJECT: Coyote Valley Corridor Study RECOMMENDATION Direct the City Manager to place the draft Coyote Valley Corridor Study on a future City Council agenda as a consent item. BACKGROUND On November 16, 2021, the Council directed the City Manager to initiate the Coyote Valley Corridor Study. The purpose of the Study was to “analyze existing and potential new uses for the properties located along the east side of Monterey Road in Coyote Valley, which are compatible with or directly support the region’s agriculture and open space resources.” The Study was paused in June 2025 to redirect staff capacity and resources to priority workplan items. A future Council retains the discretion to continue working on the Study, pending available resources and capacity. In the meantime, we request that the Study appear on a future Council agenda as a consent item to accept the draft report and assessment, acknowledging staff’s work and community input.
Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The document titled 'Workload Analysis' pertains to the Coyote Valley Corridor Study and includes evaluations and recommendations regarding its implementation. The staff recommends not adopting the nominated idea due to its current pause in the work plan and the prioritization of other critical projects. The analysis indicates that while some preliminary assessments were completed, the study has not progressed to a draft report stage. The document includes scoring criteria for project complexity, indicating a medium complexity score of 8, with an estimated duration of 6 to 9 months for potential implementation.
Key points
Department involved: PBCE
Department representative: Martina Davis
Councilmember sponsorship includes Mahan, Foley, Campos
Staff recommends not adopting the Coyote Valley Corridor Study due to its pause in the work plan.
No substantial resources or staffing are required for the study at this time.
The project complexity score is 8, categorized as medium complexity.
Estimated duration for potential implementation is 6 to 9 months.
A draft report on the study would delay other priority policy work.
Limitations
The document appears to be a draft, as indicated by the presence of draft assessments and recommendations.
There are unresolved placeholders and blank fields that affect the completeness of the summary.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 4,470 chars
ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĨŽƌWŽůŝĐLJŶĂůLJƐŝƐ;ŽƵŶĐŝůZĞĨĞƌƌĂůƐͿ Rules Date 2/25/26 Department PBCE Department Rep. Name/Ext. Martina Davis x5-7888 Policy/Ordinance Subject Coyote Valley Corridor Study Item Mahan, Foley, Campos Councilmember Sponsorship Staff Recommendation ܆GREEN Adopt based on tradeoffs ܆ ✔ YELLOW efer to ĂůĂƚĞƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚ ܆RED ĚĂƚĞŽƌƚŚĞĂŶŶƵĂůƵĚŐĞƚWƌŽĐĞƐƐ outlined on next page Recommend Council not adopt nominated idea Staff Evaluation Is this already underway in a department work plan? Is this time critical or an emergency? ܆Yes ✔ No ܆ ܆NEEDS CLARIFICATION OR MORE TIME TO EVALUATE Will this require substantial resources, staffing, budget, strategic support͕ŽƌƌĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐǁŽƌŬƉůĂŶ? ✔ No ܆ ܆Yes C.2 ܆ ✔ Yes ܆No Scoring Criterion Criterion to Determine Scale of Project Complexity Project complexity is determined by scoring the project in each of the 3 criterions below and then summing the score. a. Low Complexity is a sum of 6 or less. b. Medium Complexity is a sum of 7 – 9. Total Score = 8 c. High Complexity is a sum of 10 or greater. Low Complexity Medium Complexity High Complexity Estimated Duration 6 – 9 months =܆1 9 - 18...
Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The document appears to be a draft communication regarding the Coyote Valley/Monterey Road Corridor Study. It includes a request to append a joint environmental letter dated May 15, 2024, to the staff report for future agenda items. The letter critiques the city's draft 'Economic and Policy Assessments' document from April 2024, highlighting inaccuracies and the need for revisions to ensure compatibility with environmental objectives and policies. The communication emphasizes the importance of wildlife movement, flood protection, and agricultural preservation in the Coyote Valley area.
Key points
Request to append a joint environmental letter to the staff report for the Coyote Valley Corridor Study.
Critique of the city's draft 'Economic and Policy Assessments' document for inaccuracies.
Emphasis on the need for compatibility with environmental objectives and policies.
Concerns regarding wildlife movement, flood protection, and agricultural preservation in Coyote Valley.
Limitations
The document is a draft and contains unresolved placeholders.
Specific dates, votes, dollar amounts, and outcomes are not provided.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 25,436 chars
2/20/26, 2:53 PM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Se Outlook Fw: Coyote Valley/Monterey Road Corridor Study From Agendadesk <Agendadesk@sanjoseca.gov> Date Fri 2/20/2026 2:36 PM To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <rulescommitteeagenda@sanjoseca.gov> iy 1 attachment (393 KB) Joint_letter_EconomicPolicyAssmt_5.15.24. pdf; From: City Clerk <city.clerk@sanjoseca.gov> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2026 2:27 PM To: Agendadesk <Agendadesk@sanjoseca.gov> Cc: Roche, Megan <megan.roche@sanjoseca.gov> Subject: FW: Coyote Valley/Monterey Road Corridor Study From: Alice Kaufman Sent: Friday, February 20, 2026 1:31 PM To: Wilcox, Leland <Leland.Wilcox@sanjoseca.gov>; Burton, Chris <Christopher.Burton@sanjoseca.gov>; Hughey, Rosalynn <Rosalynn.Hughey@sanjoseca.gov>; Maguire, Jennifer <jennifer.maguire@sanjoseca.gov>; Carvalho, Brent <Brent.Carvalho@sanjoseca.gov> Cc: City Clerk <city.clerk@sanjoseca.gov>; District2 <District2 @sanjoseca.gov>; District9 <district9 @sanjoseca.gov>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <mayor@sanjoseca.gov>; Lucas Ramire Subject: Coyote Valley/Monterey Road Corridor Study [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from...