Skip to main content
San Jose Civic Gallery City Hall agenda intelligence

Matter 25-672

At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program. - RENUMBERED

Transportation City Council Agenda Ready Introduced 02 Jun 2025
3 Documents on file 37.3 MB · 3 extracted · 3 AI summaries
File
25-672
Type
Consent Agenda
Status
Agenda Ready
Requester
Unknown
Introduced
02 Jun 2025
Last synced
19 May 2026 · 03:54

The papers

01 4.72 MB

Memorandum

4.72 MB Extracted AI Summary
file e09b1345-6450-452c-93a6-64d9facaee10.pdf sha 01289cdad17e source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The memorandum discusses the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program, which has been recommended for environmental review by the Transportation and Environment Committee and the Diridon Station Steering Committee. It outlines various project elements including the closure of West Virginia Street, grade separation at Auzerais Avenue, and the replacement of the San Carlos Street bridge. The memorandum also details the collaborative efforts of multiple agencies to enhance the Diridon Station to accommodate future transit needs. The At-Grade Alternative is favored for its cost-effectiveness and lesser construction disruption compared to the Elevated Alternative.

Key points
  • The memorandum is addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program.
  • The project includes the closure of West Virginia Street, Auzerais Avenue grade separation, and San Carlos Street bridge replacement.
  • The Diridon Partner Agencies have been collaborating since 2018 to plan the transformation of Diridon Station.
  • The At-Grade Alternative is preferred due to lower costs and reduced construction impacts compared to the Elevated Alternative.
  • Next steps include selecting an environmental consulting contract and further community engagement.
Limitations
  • The document contains unresolved placeholders and incomplete sections, particularly in the next steps and project delivery options.
  • Specific dates and details about the project timeline and funding are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 71,574 chars
COUNCIL AGENDA : 6/10/2025 FILE : 25-672 ITEM : 2.27 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: Toni J. Taber, MMC City Clerk DATE: June 4, 2025 SUBJECT: At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program Recommendation As recommended by the Transportation and Environment Committee on June 2, 2025 and the Diridon Station Steering Committee on May 21, 2025, accept the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program for environmental review, which includes the following: (a) At-Grade Station Alternative (platforms, tracks, historic station, concourse, plazas, bus facility, light rail station, other affected improvements); (b) West Virginia Street closure at the rail crossing with new pedestrian and bike undercrossing; (c) Auzerais Avenue grade separation; (d) San Carlos Street bridge replacement; (e) Park Avenue reconfiguration; (f) Noise/sound barriers at select crossings/locations; and (g) Stockton Avenue/The Alameda reconfiguration. CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-007, Preliminary direction to staff and eventual action requires approval from decision-making body. Council District 6. (Transportation) [Transportation and Environment Committee referral...
02 2.77 MB

Presentation, 6/2/25, T&E

2.77 MB Extracted AI Summary
file ce911621-55d2-40e6-ab6f-71de87371281.pdf sha 8f60701df05d source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document presents an overview of the At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program, led by Jessica Zenk and Ramses Madou from the Department of Transportation. It outlines goals for community development, passenger experience, and transit operations. The document includes a visioning process, constructability analysis, community engagement recap, and staff recommendations for environmental review. Key findings compare at-grade and elevated construction options, highlighting costs, impacts, and benefits. Next steps involve actions by partner agencies and additional environmental work.

Key points
  • Goals include economic development, passenger-friendly station, and safe transit operations.
  • Constructability analysis shows at-grade construction has a shorter period and lower costs compared to elevated options.
  • Community engagement highlights pros and cons for both at-grade and elevated alternatives.
  • Staff recommends approving the At-Grade Station Alternative for environmental review.
  • Next steps include selecting an environmental consulting contract and further community engagement.
Limitations
  • The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and lacks finalized details.
  • Unresolved placeholders include specific project elements and costs.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 4,082 chars
(d)3. At-Grade Station Alternative and Diridon Program Jessica Zenk, Deputy Director Ramses Madou, Division Manager Dept. of Transportation Transportation and Environment Committee June 2, 2025 Goals The Surrounding Community: An anchor for economic & community development The Passenger Experience: A connected, multi-modal and passenger-friendly station Partners & Key Stakeholders: Achieving strategic aims and optimizing benefits for Partners and key stakeholders Safe Transit Operators & Operations: Providing sufficient capacity, facilitating safe, integrated and reliable transit operations The Station Building: A sustainable, future-proof and resilient station 2 Visioning and Alternatives Development Assess Station Components Develop Alternatives (3) 2024 Refine Alternatives (3) Recommend Recommended Alternatives (2) Alternative (1) May 2025 3 Constructability Analysis Key Findings Considerations At-Grade Elevated Construction Period & Rail Service Impacts 7 – 10 Years 10 – 12 Years Cost ($2023) $3B-$6B $5B-$10B Existing Rail Corridor Modest encroachments outside existing corridor Significant encroachments outside existing corridor Maintains access to CEMOF FATAL FLAWS Loses...
03 29.8 MB

Letters from the Public

29.8 MB Extracted AI Summary
file 17cac271-0a9c-4554-a919-6e311b3503a5.pdf sha ebf0fc651d72 source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) submitted comments on the Diridon Station Status Report, expressing support for the project and emphasizing the need for bike lanes, shared use paths, and bicycle parking facilities. They highlighted the importance of connecting bikeways to the station and ensuring the project aligns with Vision Zero goals. The comments were approved unanimously at the May 19, 2025 BPAC meeting. Additionally, a memorandum from members of the Diridon Station Steering Committee outlined recommendations for project approval, community engagement, and funding strategies, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive environmental review process and continued community involvement.

Key points
  • BPAC supports the Diridon Station project and requests key elements like bike lanes and shared paths.
  • They emphasize the importance of coordinating with the 'Reimagining Santa Clara Street' initiative.
  • BPAC requests bicycle parking facilities to accommodate current and future riders.
  • The Diridon Station project aims to convert motorists to greener transportation options.
  • A memorandum from the Diridon Station Steering Committee recommends project approval and community engagement.
  • The committee emphasizes the need for a funding strategy and environmental review process.
Limitations
  • The text contains unresolved placeholders and missing information regarding specific dates and funding details.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 6,451 chars
TO: TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: Diridon Station Status Report FROM: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee DATE: 5/19/25 ______________________________________________________________________________ Your Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) would like to submit the following comments on the "Diridon Station Status Report": 1. We support our City’s plan for Diridon Station, and we look forward to this project’s completion. 2. Given the new and uncertain budgeting constraints, we ask you to do whatever is needed to ensure that these remain part of this project: a. Please ensure that key elements of this plan include bike lanes, a shared use path, and ensure that this station’s interaction with adjacent roads favors vulnerable roadways users in alignment with Vision Zero goals. b. If this isn’t being done already, we ask that the “Reimagining Santa Clara Street” initiative be coordinated with VTA on the timeline, construction, and planning of the Diridon Station. c. Given Diridon Station will connect commuters to AMTRAK, CALTRAIN, and VTA options, and there is local, regional, and statewide support of mode shift, please include bicycle parking...