Resolution Establishing Speed Limits.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The memorandum discusses a resolution to establish speed limits in the City of San José, proposing to repeal an existing resolution and set new speed limits on various roadways. It outlines the recommendation to lower speed limits on 18 roadways and maintain current limits on others, emphasizing safety and compliance with state law. The actions support the City’s Vision Zero Action Plan aimed at reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries. The document includes details about the Engineering and Traffic Surveys required for speed limit adjustments and the legislative context provided by recent Assembly Bills. A cost estimate for implementing new speed limit signs is also included.

Key points

• Resolution to repeal Resolution No. 80662 and establish new speed limits.
• Proposed changes to speed limits on 18 roadways in San José.
• Maintaining current speed limits on portions of McLaughlin Avenue, Story Road, and White Road.
• Supports the City’s 2025 Vision Zero Action Plan.
• Speed limits must comply with California Vehicle Code and be based on Engineering and Traffic Surveys.
• Estimated cost for new speed limit signs is approximately $150,000.

Limitations

• The text appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and incomplete sections.
• Specific dates and outcomes related to the resolution's approval are not provided.
• Some roadway segments and details are truncated in the provided text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document is a draft resolution from the City Council of San Jose to repeal Resolution No. 80622 and establish new speed limits on various roadways in compliance with state law. It includes changes to speed limits on 18 roadways and maintains current limits on certain segments. The resolution aims to enhance traffic safety and order by setting reasonable speed limits based on engineering and traffic surveys.

Key points

• Repeals Resolution No. 80622.
• Establishes new speed limits on 18 roadways.
• Maintains current speed limits on specific segments.
• Includes a 20 mph speed limit in a business activity district.
• Based on traffic surveys and safety considerations.

Limitations

• The document is a draft and contains unresolved placeholders for adoption dates and voting results.
• Attachment A is referenced but not fully included in the text.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document outlines a resolution establishing speed limits, emphasizing the importance of lower speed limits in reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries. It references recent traffic fatality statistics and legislative support for speed limit adjustments in specific areas. The plan includes outreach efforts and the installation of signage in September 2025.

Key points

• Speeding is a primary factor in crash severity.
• 49 traffic fatalities occurred in 2024, with 39 on streets posted at 35 mph or higher.
• Lower posted speed limits are part of the Vision Zero Action Plan.
• Assembly Bills 43 and 1938 allow for flexibility in establishing speed limits.
• Plans to lower speed limits on 23 street segments and maintain limits on 3 segments.
• Outreach will include newsletters, social media, and message signs.
• Signage and markings are scheduled for installation in September 2025.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The attachment contains public comments regarding Item 5.2, a resolution to establish speed limits in San Jose. Several residents express support for lowering speed limits on various streets to enhance safety for pedestrians and cyclists. Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of speed limit enforcement and potential traffic congestion resulting from the changes. Specific streets mentioned include Park Ave, Camden, and Monterey Road. The comments reflect a mix of support and opposition to the proposed speed limit reductions.

Key points

• Ryan Globus supports reducing speed limits on various streets, citing a personal incident involving a car while biking.
• Lan Emmons advocates for lowering speed limits, emphasizing the impact of even a small reduction on safety.
• Deanna Chevas supports lowering speed limits and suggests adding traffic calming measures.
• Jordan Moldow expresses strong support for the proposed speed limit reductions and discusses their importance in the Vision Zero Action Plan.
• Ruth Callahan opposes the speed limit reductions on major arteries, arguing it will increase congestion and road rage.
• Jay Neuman supports the resolution, highlighting the benefits of lower speed limits for active transportation and neighborhood safety.

Limitations

• The text includes unresolved placeholders and incomplete information, such as missing specific details about the proposed speed limits.
• Some comments reference external issues and political sentiments that may not be directly related to the speed limit resolution.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.