GP23-011: Early Consideration for Denial for a Privately-Initiated General Plan Amendment to Change the Envision San José 2040 General Plan Land Use/Transportation Diagram from Neighborhood/Community Commercial to Transit Residential for Property Located at 826 North Winchester Boulevard. - TO BE HEARD AT 6:00 P.M.

This memorandum discusses the early consideration for denial of a privately-initiated General Plan Amendment (GP23-011) to change the land use designation for a property at 826 North Winchester Boulevard from Neighborhood/Community Commercial to Transit Residential. The Planning Commission's motions to support the staff recommendation to deny the amendment failed to achieve a majority vote. The City Council is presented with options to either deny the amendment or direct staff to continue processing it. Public feedback has been mixed, with some supporting the project for its potential housing and economic benefits, while others raised concerns about height, safety, and compatibility with the neighborhood. The memorandum outlines the planning process, public outreach, and the need for further evaluation of the proposal.

Key points

• The memorandum is regarding GP23-011 for a General Plan Amendment at 826 North Winchester Boulevard.
• The Planning Commission voted 4-4-1, resulting in no recommendation due to a lack of majority.
• Staff recommends denying the amendment or continuing its processing for further evaluation.
• Public feedback includes both support for housing development and concerns about project height and neighborhood compatibility.
• The City Council can approve or deny the proposed amendment based on the Planning Commission's discussions.

Limitations

• The text contains unresolved placeholders and incomplete sections, affecting the completeness of the summary.
• Specific details such as dollar amounts, exact dates, and outcomes of votes are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

This memorandum from Councilmember Mulcahy discusses a proposed General Plan Amendment for a property located at 826 North Winchester Boulevard. The recommendation is to deny the amendment to change the land use designation from Neighborhood/Community Commercial to Transit Residential. The memo outlines concerns regarding the site's lack of proximity to robust public transit and its potential negative impact on the city's growth goals. It suggests that the Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement Department evaluate the site for future residential or mixed-use development during the upcoming General Plan Four Year Review.

Key points

• The memorandum is addressed to the Mayor and City Council from Councilmember Mulcahy.
• The subject is a proposed General Plan Amendment for 826 North Winchester Boulevard.
• The recommendation is to deny the proposed amendment to change the land use designation.
• The current designation is Neighborhood/Community Commercial, which is suitable for retail and office use.
• The proposed designation, Transit Residential, is deemed inappropriate due to limited public transit access.
• The memo emphasizes the need for housing and suggests exploring mixed-use development in the future.

Limitations

• The document does not provide specific details about the application date or the context of the proposed changes.
• There are unresolved placeholders in the document, such as the APN number and specific evaluation parameters.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The City Council of San Jose has denied an application for an amendment to the Envision San Jose 2040 General Plan, which sought to modify the land use designation from Neighborhood/Community Commercial to Transit Residential on a 0.61-acre site at 826 North Winchester Boulevard. The denial follows recommendations from city staff and public hearings held by both the Planning Commission and the City Council.

Key points

• Resolution No. _____ denies the General Plan Amendment File No. GP23-011.
• The proposed amendment involved converting employment land to non-employment uses.
• City staff recommended denial of the amendment.
• Public hearings were held on May 14, 2025, and June 10, 2025.
• The amendment was found to be fundamentally inconsistent with the General Plan.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft.
• Several fields, such as the resolution number and dates for adoption and certification, are unfilled.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

This document presents an early consideration for a privately-initiated General Plan Amendment (File No. GP23-011) scheduled for City Council review on June 10, 2025. The proposal involves changing the land use designation from Neighborhood/Community Commercial to Transit Residential, which is inconsistent with several General Plan policies. The project includes the demolition of an existing commercial building and the construction of a 17-story building with residential units and commercial space. The Planning Commission did not reach a majority vote on the recommendation, and the staff recommends denying the amendment. The City Council has several options for action regarding the proposal.

Key points

• The proposal is for a General Plan Amendment (File No. GP23-011) to change land use designation.
• Current designation is Neighborhood/Community Commercial; proposed is Transit Residential.
• The project includes a 17-story building, 135 residential units, and 15,000 square feet of commercial space.
• The Planning Commission failed to reach a majority vote on the recommendation.
• Staff recommends denying the amendment due to inconsistencies with General Plan policies.
• City Council can approve the staff recommendation, deny it and continue processing, or modify the proposal.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and lacks finalized details.
• Specific dates, votes, and dollar amounts are not provided.
• Some sections contain unresolved placeholders affecting the summary.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The letter from Mayor Lisa M. Gillmor and Vice Mayor Kelly Cox of Santa Clara expresses strong opposition to the proposed development at 826 N Winchester Blvd, reflecting feedback from District 6 residents. Concerns include the project's height and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, increased traffic and safety issues, and strain on infrastructure. The letter emphasizes the need for thoughtful housing solutions and calls for collaboration between Santa Clara and San José on future developments.

Key points

• Opposition to the 17-story development at 826 N Winchester Blvd due to resident feedback.
• Concerns about the scale and compatibility of the proposed structure with the surrounding area.
• Traffic congestion and safety issues raised by residents, particularly near senior communities.
• Concerns about infrastructure strain, including emergency response and utilities.
• Acknowledgment of the need for well-planned housing but disagreement with the proposed project's height and density.
• Call for more intentional dialogue between Santa Clara and San José regarding impacts on neighboring communities.

Limitations

• The letter includes placeholders for recipients and cc'd individuals that are not filled in.
• The document appears to be a draft as it contains a date and context indicating it is a communication regarding a specific agenda item.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document contains letters from the public expressing opposition to the 826 N. Winchester Boulevard project, citing concerns about its construction in a liquefaction zone and its incompatibility with the existing neighborhood. Residents argue that the proposed tall buildings pose risks during earthquakes and are not suitable for the area, which lacks adequate public transit and is characterized by low-density residential properties.

Key points

• Opposition to the 826 N. Winchester Boulevard project due to its location in a liquefaction zone.
• Concerns about the structural integrity of a 17 & 15 story building during an earthquake.
• Claims that the project is incompatible with existing zoning and neighborhood character.
• Lack of public transit accessibility near the proposed site.
• Residents prefer developments that conform to existing zoning laws.

Limitations

• The text is fragmented and appears to be truncated, limiting the completeness of the summary.
• Unresolved placeholders and incomplete sentences affect the clarity of some points.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document contains letters addressing the proposed zoning amendment for 826 N. Winchester, which is set to be reviewed by the San Jose City Council. Concerned Cory Neighbors express opposition to the amendment, arguing it does not align with the General Plan and would negatively impact the neighborhood. They highlight issues such as the developer's reliability, potential traffic congestion, and strain on local infrastructure. In contrast, San José YIMBY supports the project, citing the need for housing and its alignment with city goals. Santa Clara District 6 representatives also express opposition, emphasizing concerns about the project's scale, traffic, and infrastructure strain.

Key points

• Concerned Cory Neighbors oppose the zoning amendment for 826 N. Winchester, stating it does not comply with the General Plan.
• They argue the proposal would negatively impact the character of the neighborhood and strain local infrastructure.
• The developer, VCI Companies, is criticized for lacking experience with large buildings.
• San José YIMBY supports the project, citing the need for housing and alignment with city sustainability goals.
• Santa Clara District 6 representatives express strong opposition, highlighting concerns about traffic congestion and the project's scale.

Limitations

• The text includes unresolved placeholders and truncated sections that limit the completeness of the summary.
• Specific dates and outcomes related to the zoning amendment process are not provided.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.

The document contains a letter from Douglas M. Chesshire, Senior Organizer of the Nor Cal Carpenters Union, addressed to Mayor Matt Mahan and the City Council of San Jose. The letter expresses strong support for the proposed development by VCI Companies at 826 N. Winchester Blvd., highlighting its potential to provide housing and create union construction jobs. The letter emphasizes the importance of empowering local apprentices and urges collaboration between the City and VCI Companies to realize the project.

Key points

• The letter is from Douglas M. Chesshire, Senior Organizer of the Nor Cal Carpenters Union.
• It is addressed to Mayor Matt Mahan and the City Council of San Jose.
• The letter supports the proposed development at 826 N. Winchester Blvd. by VCI Companies.
• The development is expected to provide housing and generate union construction jobs.
• The letter emphasizes the empowerment of local apprentices, including women, minorities, veterans, and at-risk youth.
• It encourages collaboration between the City and VCI Companies to overcome challenges and achieve responsible development.

Limitations

• The document appears to be a draft as it includes placeholders and formatting instructions.
• The date mentioned in the email is June 10, 2025, which may not reflect the current context.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

The document is an email from Benson Louie expressing support for a housing proposal at 826 N Winchester. Louie is unable to speak at the City Council meeting but emphasizes the importance of the project, stating that the benefits of 135 new homes outweigh any potential drawbacks. He urges the City Council to keep the project alive.

Key points

• Email from Benson Louie to the City Council regarding support for housing at 826 N Winchester.
• Louie cannot attend the Council meeting but wishes to register his support.
• He argues that the benefits of 135 new homes outweigh any claimed drawbacks.
• Louie highlights the importance of housing and urges the Council to continue the project.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.