Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
The San José City Council Closed Session Agenda for September 9, 2025, includes discussions on existing litigation and anticipated litigation involving various claims. The agenda lists multiple cases related to worker's compensation appeals and other legal matters, including claims against the City of San José and other parties. Specific case names and court details are provided, but some sections remain unfilled.
Key points
Meeting scheduled for September 9, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. in City Hall Conference Room W-133.
Discussion items include existing litigation and anticipated litigation.
Cases listed involve worker's compensation claims and other legal matters.
Specific cases include claims of Hodges, Fontaine, Scocca, Sivertsen, Ardizzone, Biersdorff, and Suarez.
One case involves Kyle Johnson against the City of San José.
Anticipated litigation includes a claim by Anthony Loek.
Limitations
Several case names and details are missing or incomplete.
Some sections related to amounts of money or other relief sought are unfilled.
The document appears to be a draft as it contains unresolved placeholders.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 3,984 chars
NORA FRIMANN, CITY ATTORNEY SAN JOSÉ CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AGENDA September 9, 2025 Place: City Hall Conference Room W-133 Time: 9:30 a.m. Item(s) to be discussed: A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1): 1. 2. Case Name: Name(s) of Party(ies): In re: Claim of Hodges Court: Case No: Amount of Money or Other Relief Sought: Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court ADJ18453540 Benefits Case Name: Name(s) of Party(ies): In re: Claim of Fontaine Court: Case No: Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court ADJ11250197, ADJ11248997, ADJ11250239, ADJ1249120, ADJ11249122, ADJ11435149 Benefits Amount of Money or Other Relief Sought: 3. 4. Case Name: Name(s) of Party(ies): Court: Case No: Amount of Money or Other Relief Sought: In re: Claim of Scocca Case Name: Name(s) of Party(ies): Court: Case No: Amount of Money or In re: Claim of Sivertsen Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court ADJ18612787 Benefits Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court ADJ12502102 Benefits Other Relief Sought: 5. 6. 7. 8. Case Name: Name(s) of Party(ies): Court: Case No: Amount of Money or Other Relief Sought: In re: Claim of Ardizzone Case Name: Name(s) of...
Official source link unavailable.
The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.
Generated summaryAI-assisted
The source text indicates this attachment appears to be a draft document.
This document is a settlement demand letter from The Law Guys, APC, representing Anthony Loek in a case against the City of San Jose. Mr. Loek alleges disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, and wrongful termination related to his employment as a Warehouse Worker I. He claims that despite his proactive requests for reasonable accommodations due to his autism, his job offer was rescinded without proper justification after accommodations were initially approved. The letter outlines Mr. Loek's experiences, legal claims under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act, and proposes a settlement to resolve the matter amicably.
Key points
Anthony Loek alleges disability discrimination and wrongful termination by the City of San Jose.
Mr. Loek is on the autism spectrum and requested reasonable accommodations for his employment.
The City initially approved some accommodations but later rescinded his job offer without proper justification.
The letter cites violations of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act.
Mr. Loek seeks a settlement that includes compensation and the redaction of negative comments from his personnel file.
Limitations
The document appears to be a draft as it contains placeholders and formatting issues.
Specific dates and details regarding the settlement amount are not clearly stated.
Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.
Extracted text preview · 17,242 chars
THE LAW GUYS, APC 4231 Balboa Avenue #1261, San Diego, CA 92117 Andrew Athanassious | (916) 587-1457 | legal@thelawguys.com CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT COMMUNICATION Protected by California Evidence Code §§1152 and 1154 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Match 24, 2025 City of San Jose 200 E. Santa Clara Street San Jose, CA 95113 Anthony Loek v. City of San Jose To Whom Itit May Concern: ey ttt eptbean: The purpose of this letter is to inform 8you that M ' anthony 8Tony= Loek has retained The Law Guys, APC regarding the9 disability discrimination; failure, to. accommodate, and. wrongful termination he experienced during his éthployment with the City. of <San Jose. Mr. Loek, who is on the autism spectrum, was offered a: position aas. a Warehouse Worker I, and from the outset, he engaged in good faith efforts to ensure a successful transition by requesting: reasonable accommodations based on his disability. Rather than being supported, he was misled, ignored, and ultimately had his job offer rescinded in direct violation of California9s Fair Employment and Housing Act. Accordingly, Mr. Loek seeks damages for the harm he has suffered, as detailed below. . BACKGROUND, Mr. Anthony <Tony= Loek was...