Skip to main content
San Jose Civic Gallery City Hall agenda intelligence

Matter 26-334

Status of Open Audit Recommendations Report.

Public Records & Transparency City Council Agenda Ready Introduced 18 Mar 2026
3 Documents on file 3.14 MB · 3 extracted · 3 AI summaries
File
26-334
Type
Strategic Support
Status
Agenda Ready
Requester
Unknown
Introduced
18 Mar 2026
Last synced
03 Jun 2026 · 12:18

The papers

01 1.54 MB

Memorandum

1.54 MB Extracted AI Summary
file 9a70751e-57f8-46bf-bd92-388f8960165c.pdf sha e5a19e95c98a source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The memorandum discusses the status of open audit recommendations as of December 31, 2025, and recommends that the City Council accept this status. The City Auditor's Office reports that 57 recommendations have been implemented or closed in the last six months, with a total of 88 recommendations remaining open, of which 63 are partly implemented. The report highlights the progress made by various city departments and provides details on specific recommendations and their statuses.

Key points
  • The City Auditor's Office reviews open audit recommendations every six months.
  • 57 recommendations have been implemented or closed since the last update.
  • 88 percent of audit recommendations made over the past decade have been implemented or closed.
  • Currently, 88 recommendations remain open, with 63 partly implemented.
  • The report includes a summary of results and specific examples of implemented recommendations from various departments.
Limitations
  • The text contains unresolved placeholders and lacks specific details in certain sections, such as dollar amounts and dates for some recommendations.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 205,874 chars
COUNCIL AGENDA : 3/24/2026 FILE : 26-334 ITEM : 3.5 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW FROM: Toni J. Taber, MMC City Clerk DATE: March 18, 2026 SUBJECT: Status of Open Audit Recommendations Report Recommendation Accept the Status of the Open Audit Recommendations as of December 31, 2025. CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-009, Staff Reports, Assessments, Annual Reports, and Informational Memos that involve no approvals of any City action. (City Auditor) [Rules Committee referral 3/18/2026 - Item A.1.a] Office of the City Auditor Report to the City Council City of San José STATUS OF OPEN AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2025 December 2025 This page was intentionally left blank Status of Open Audit Recommendations as of December 31, 2025 2 Office of the City Auditor Joe Rois, City Auditor March 13, 2026 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of San José 200 E. Santa Clara Street San José, CA 95113 STATUS OF OPEN AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2025 RECOMMENDATION We recommend the City Council accept the Status of Open Audit Recommendations as of December 31, 2025. SUMMARY OF RESULTS The City Auditor’s Office reviews open audit recommendations...
02 274 KB

Presentation - est. 10 minutes

274 KB Extracted AI Summary
file 78f1887c-459d-477e-a8da-c70ea1f2c929.pdf sha a9dd62348ceb source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The document provides an update on the status of open audit recommendations by the City Auditor as of December 31, 2025. It includes a summary of 145 recommendations, with 36 new recommendations made since the last update, 57 implemented or closed, 63 partly implemented, and 25 not implemented. The document highlights specific departments that have implemented recommendations, such as Animal Care & Services, Public Works, and Housing, among others. It also outlines twelve priority recommendations aimed at potential budget savings, operational efficiency, and improved service delivery.

Key points
  • 145 total recommendations.
  • 36 new recommendations since the last update.
  • 57 recommendations implemented or closed.
  • 63 recommendations partly implemented.
  • 25 recommendations not implemented.
  • 88% of recommendations implemented or closed over the last 10 years.
  • Highlights of implemented recommendations include updates from various departments such as Animal Care & Services and Public Works.
  • Twelve priority recommendations focus on budget savings, operational efficiency, and improved service delivery.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 4,304 chars
Status of Open Audit Recommendations as of December 31, 2025 An update by the City Auditor Issued March 2026 http://www.sanjoseca.gov/auditor March 24, 2025, City Council item 3.5 Presented by: Joe Rois, City Auditor Michelle Mallari, Program Performance Auditor Office of the City Auditor, 1 Summary of Results 145 Recommendations 36 new recommendations made since last update 57 implemented or closed since last update 63 partly implemented, 25 not implemented 88% implemented / closed over the last 10 years Office of the City Auditor, 2 Departments Implemented 57 Recommendations Highlights of implemented recommendations in this period: Animal Care & Services (ACS): Implemented or closed the remaining recommendations from the 2024 audit of ACS, including completing shelter capacity assessments; updating guidance around the daily care of animals, supervisory responsibilities, and data entry; and addressing other issues identified in the audit. Council Policy 1-18: The Administration proposed, and Council approved, updates the Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Policy to clarify guidelines on cost recovery, considerations of ratepayer impacts, and reserves and fund...
03 1.34 MB

Letters from the Public

1.34 MB Extracted AI Summary
file dc3e02e9-e189-4368-bdef-53c34d0a4fca.pdf sha 67fc56324f7e source unavailable

Official source link unavailable. The file was imported, but the current source metadata does not include a public document URL.

Generated summary AI-assisted

The document contains correspondence regarding concerns about dog handling practices at the San Jose Animal Care and Services shelter. Madeline Onumbu expresses the need for clarity on policies related to dog handling and adoption processes, particularly regarding the qualifications of staff involved in dog-to-dog (D2D) meetings. There are also formal letters opposing the acceptance of a report on audit recommendations related to Animal Care and Services, highlighting ongoing issues with animal intake, euthanasia practices, and the need for better outcomes for animals in the shelter system.

Key points
  • Madeline Onumbu is seeking clarification on dog handling expectations and policies at the shelter.
  • Concerns were raised about the qualifications of staff handling dogs during adoption meetings.
  • The shelter is reportedly overwhelmed with a high intake of puppies and pregnant dogs.
  • Letters oppose the acceptance of an audit report, arguing it does not reflect the actual outcomes for animals.
  • Issues with euthanasia practices and the return-to-owner rates are highlighted as areas of concern.
Limitations
  • The text includes multiple email exchanges, making it difficult to determine a single coherent narrative.
  • Some sections are truncated, leading to incomplete information.
  • Unresolved placeholders and missing email addresses affect the clarity of the correspondence.

Generated for convenience from extracted text using AI. Review the official source document before relying on this summary.

Extracted text preview · 27,372 chars
3/23/26, 4:31 PM Inbox - Agendadesk - Outlook To: Kinsman, Mallory <mallory.kinsman@sanjoseca.gov> CC: VolunteerACS <volunteeracs@sanjoseca.gov>, Robinson, Edward <edward.robinson@sanjoseca.gov>, Chris Chiappari < >, Marek Markuszewski < >, Kiska Icard <Kiska.Icard@sanjoseca.gov>, Wylie, Monica <Monica.Wylie@sanjoseca.gov> Hi Mallory and leadership teamI wanted to follow-up as I am still pending a response from my March 9 email where I sought clarification on what is expected when handling dogs (and my follow up reminder on March 12 when Monica and Kiska were added). It's my understanding that you have worked since March 9 and actively emailing since Mallory responded to the SDF email update. While I understand receiving updates about Olive and Boya are uplifting, I hope you are able to prioritize my email as I am seeking clarity expectations/standards around dog handling. I want to ensure the shelter team (both staff and volunteers) are all clear on the policies and are able to support each other. The lack of clarity means this is not possible. -Maddy On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 8:54 PM Madeline Onumbu < Hi Mallory- > wrote: Can you please respond to the items below. I want to make...